On the Performance of NOMA-Enabled V2V Communications Under Joint Impact of Nodes Mobility and Channel Estimation Error
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the joint impact of nodes’ mobility and channel estimation error (CEE) on the performance of non-orthogonal multiple access aided vehicular communication system. Specifically, we derive exact outage probability expressions for both near user and far user vehicles over Nakagami-m fading channels. We then analyze the asymptotic outage behavior in the high signal-to-noise ratio regime, from which valuable insights related to system’s diversity order are quantified. Furthermore, some special cases of interest are also formulated to quantify the impact of nodes’s mobility and/or CEE on the system’s outage performance. Analytical expressions of the average bit error rate and ergodic capacity for both near and far user vehicles are further derived under Nakagami-m fading channels. Finally, we corroborate our analytical findings with the numerical and simulation studies, and demonstrate the effects of transmit power, fading severity parameters, nodes’ mobility parameters, and CEE parameters on the system’s performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".