MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mapping Functional Connectivity of Epileptogenic Networks through Virtual Implantation

2021· article· en· W4200356020 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeChildren's Health FoundationHealth Foundation
KeywordsMagnetoencephalographyIctalEpilepsy surgeryCentralityNode (physics)EpilepsyLatency (audio)Correlation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) require resective neurosurgery to achieve seizure freedom, whose success depends on accurate delineation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Functional connectivity (FC) can assess the extent of epileptic brain networks since intracranial EEG (icEEG) studies have shown its link to the EZ and predictive value for surgical outcome in these patients. Here, we propose a new noninvasive method based on magnetoencephalography (MEG) and high-density (HD-EEG) data that estimates FC metrics at the source level through an "implantation" of virtual sensors (VSs). We analyzed MEG, HD-EEG, and icEEG data from eight children with MRE who underwent surgery having good outcome and performed source localization (beamformer) on noninvasive data to build VSs at the icEEG electrode locations. We analyzed data with and without Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) in different frequency bands, and computed the following FC matrices: Amplitude Envelope Correlation (AEC), Correlation (CORR), and Phase Locking Value (PLV). Each matrix was used to generate a graph using Minimum Spanning Tree (MST), and for each node (i.e., each sensor) we computed four centrality measures: betweenness, closeness, degree, and eigenvector. We tested the reliability of VSs measures with respect to icEEG (regarded as benchmark) via linear correlation, and compared FC values inside vs. outside resection. We observed higher FC inside than outside resection (p<0.05) for AEC [alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (12-30 Hz), and broadband (1-50 Hz)] on data with IEDs and AEC theta (4-8 Hz) on data without IEDs for icEEG, AEC broadband (1-50 Hz) on data without IEDs for MEG-VSs, as well as for all centrality measures of icEEG and MEG/HD-EEG-VSs. Additionally, icEEG and VSs metrics presented high correlation (0.6-0.9, p<0.05). Our data support the notion that the proposed method can potentially replicate the icEEG ability to map the epileptogenic network in children with MRE.Clinical Relevance - The estimation of FC with noninvasive techniques, such as MEG and HD-EEG, via VSs is a promising tool that would help the presurgical evaluation by delineating the EZ without waiting for a seizure to occur, and potentially improve the surgical outcome of patients with MRE undergoing surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine &amp; Biology Society (EMBC)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→