Fine Classification of Rice Paddy Based on RHSI-DT Method Using Multi-Temporal Compact Polarimetric SAR Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the compact polarimetric (CP) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has become a hotspot of SAR Earth observation. Meanwhile, CP SAR provides both relatively rich polarization information and large swath-width for rice mapping. Fine classification of rice paddy plays an important role in growth monitoring, pest prevention and yield estimation of rice. In this study, the multi-temporal CP SAR data were firstly simulated by fully polarimetric RADARSAT-2 data, and 22 CP parameters from each of the six temporal CP SAR data were extracted. Then we built a rice height-sensitive index (RHSI). Furthermore, a decision tree (DT) method was established by using the optimal CP parameters based on RHSI. Finally, the classification results of rice paddy based on DT and support vector machine (SVM) methods were compared. Results showed that the RHSI-DT method could obtain better results, with an overall accuracy of 97.94% and a kappa coefficient of 0.973, which was 2% higher and 0.03 larger than those of the SVM method. Besides, we found that the surface scattering of m-χ decomposition (m-χ_s (0627)) and ΔShannon entropy intensity Hi (Hi (1015)-Hi (0627)) were highly effective parameters to distinguish paddies of transplanting hybrid rice (T-H) and direct-sown japonica rice (D-J).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".