Reoptimizing Network Slice Embedding on EON-enabled Transport Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5G transport networks will support dynamic services with diverse requirements through network slicing. Elastic Optical Networks (EONs) facilitate transport network slicing by flexible spectrum allocation and tuning of transmission configurations such as modulation format and forward error correction. A major challenge in supporting dynamic services is the lack of a priori knowledge of future slice requests. In consequence, slice embedding can become sub-optimal over time, leading to spectrum fragmentation and skewed utilization. This in turn can block future slice requests, impacting operator revenue. Therefore, operators need to periodically re-optimize slice embedding for reducing fragmentation. In this paper, we address this problem of re-optimizing network slice embedding on EONs for minimizing fragmentation. The problem is solved in its splittable version, which significantly increases problem complexity, but offers more opportunities for a larger set of re-configuration actions. We employ simulated annealing for systematically exploring the large solution space. We also propose a greedy algorithm to address the practical constraint to limit the number of re-configuration steps taken to reach a defragmentated state. Our extensive simulations demonstrate that the greedy algorithm yields a solution very close to that obtained using simulated annealing while requiring orders of magnitude lesser number of re-configuration actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".