MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200382609 · doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00873

Bowel and Bladder Care in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

2021· article· en· W4200382609 on OpenAlexaff
Eren O. Kuris, Daniel Alsoof, Camilo Osorio, Alan H. Daniels

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpinal cord injurySpinal cordRehabilitationSurgeryAnesthesiaPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complete and incomplete spinal cord injuries affect between 250,000 and 500,000 people on an annual basis worldwide. In addition to sensory and motor dysfunction, spinal cord injury patients also suffer from associated conditions such as neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction. The degree of dysfunction varies on the level, degree, and type of spinal cord injury that occurs. In addition to the acute surgical treatment of these patients, spine surgeons should understand how to manage neurogenic bowel and bladder care on both a short- and long-term basis to minimize the risk for complications and optimize potential for rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207