MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200396716 · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.11.009

Impact of PET scanner non-linearity on the estimation of hypoxic fraction in cervical cancer patients

2021· article· en· W4200396716 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer Gottwald, Kathy Han, Michael Milosevic, Ivan Yeung, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Medica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCervical cancerScannerMedicineLinearityNuclear medicineCancerStatisticsMathematicsInternal medicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tumor hypoxia is defined as a low oxygen level in tissue and is associated with poor clinical outcome after chemo-/radiotherapy and surgery in many solid tumor types. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging provides a non-invasive means of measuring local variations in the uptake of hypoxia-targeted agents (e.g. FAZA or FMISO). Accurate quantification of uptake is critically dependent on the PET scanner's linear count rate performance. In the context of cervix cancer, high PET agent accumulation in the bladder, low uptake in the tumor, and their relative proximity makes an accurate quantification of the tumor's hypoxic fraction challenging. The purpose of this study was to estimate the impact of PET scanner non-linearity on PET-based estimation of hypoxic fraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The impact of PET scanner non-linearity effect was assessed with a NEMA body phantom, using the cylinder as the "bladder-mimicking" compartment and the water filled background as a surrogate region for the tumor. A simple model of the non-linearity effect was then applied to a set of patient-derived FAZA-PET scans (N = 38) to estimate the impact of the non-linearity on the calculated hypoxic fraction (HF) for each patient. RESULTS: The NEMA body phantom measurements revealed a substantial overestimate of activity outside the injected "bladder mimicking" cylinder compartment. This uptake resulted in an overestimate in activity between 1.9 and 0.3 kBq/cc corresponding to distances from 1.0 - 7.0 cm from the cylinder. In the patient-derived PET images, the bladder-to-tumor distance ranged between 1.0 and 3.0 cm. For the 38 patients analyzed, the HF was demonstrated to decrease by 1.1-75.0 % [median 27.2 %] depending on distance and relative uptake levels. Additionally, the magnitude of the effect of the non-linearity was found to depend on the pre-scanning hydration protocol employed (p = 0.0065). CONCLUSION: Hypoxia imaging of tumors of the cervix is challenging due to patient specific activity accumulation in the bladder and the non-linear response of PET scanner performance. This can result in a substantial overestimate of the calculated hypoxic fraction in cervical tumors. Additional effort needs to be invested to improve the linearity of PET scanners in anatomical regions proximal to the bladder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica MedicaSame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207