MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200399164 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1121957/v1

The Application of Fuzzification for Solving Quadratic Functions

2021· preprint· en· W4200399164 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFuzzy Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadratic equationMathematicsFuzzy logicFuzzy setSet (abstract data type)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes an approximation algorithm for solving standard quadratic optimization problems(StQPs) over the standard simplex by using fuzzification technique. We show that the approximate solution of the algorithm is an epsilon -critical point and satisfies epsilon-delta condition. The algorithm is compared with IBM ILOG CPLEX (short for CPLEX). The computational results indicate that the new algorithm is faster than CPLEX. Especially for infeasible problems. Furthermore, we calculate 100 instances for different size StQP problems. The numerical experiments show that the average computational time of the new algorithm for calculating the first local minimizer is in BigO(n) when the size of the problems is less or equal to 450.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it