Ground Penetrating Radar: Applications in sand and gravel aggregate exploration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter demonstrates that ground penetrating radar (GPR) can be used to map the depth and lateral extent of sand and gravel deposits. With the demand for aggregate likely to increase, future planning for aggregate needs is important. GPR can aid in preliminary investigations as well as in detailed exploration for sand and gravel aggregate. The term braid delta can be described as laterally extensive, sheet-like sand and gravel bodies dominated by trough and planar, tabular cross-bedding underlain by lacustrine mud or bedrock. Fan-foreset deltas are dominated by coarse-grained, steeply-inclined layers. Most of the sand and gravel sediment is stored in the dipping foreset facies. In the Fort McMurray region, Alberta, Fisher et al. collected and described numerous GPR profiles from catastrophic flood deposit. At the Calgary site, although each geophysical method tested revealed information regarding the aggregate deposit, it was determined that GPR was the most suitable method to meet the survey objectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it