MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Complementary Silicon Quantum Dot-EnzymePlatform for Selective Detection of NitroaromaticsCompounds

2021· preprint· en· W4200401075 on OpenAlexafffund
Leanne Milburn, Christopher Jay T. Robidillo, Rochelin Dalangin, Jonathan G. C. Veinot

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesUniversity of the PhilippinesUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsParaoxonTrinitrotolueneNanotechnologyChemistryQuantum dotExplosive materialSelectivityNerve agentSiliconCombinatorial chemistryBiosensorExplosive detectionEnzymeMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryAcetylcholinesterase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address the issue of poor selectivity in nanotechnology-driven, portable nitroaromatics sensors, we have coupled a ratiometric photoluminescence sensor based on silicon quantum dots and fluorescent proteins with a colorimetric enzyme-based sensor. Together, the sensors allow differentiation of nitroaromatic compounds – specifically, distinguishing acetylcholinergic nerve agents from the explosive compounds explored herein. The combined system can detect 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene and 4-nitrophenol with micromolar detection limits and affords subsequent differentiation from the nitro-containing nerve agent paraoxon. This demonstrates the advantage of merging elements of materials chemistry and biochemistry to devise customized sensors which can accurately identify hazardous chemical species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxiv→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→