Optimizing the Performance of Web Applications in Mobile Cloud Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud computing adoption is on the rise. Many organizations have decided to shift their workload to the cloud to benefit from the scalability, resilience, and cost reduction characteristics. Mobile Cloud Computing (MCC) is an emerging computing paradigm that also provides many advantages to mobile users. Mobile devices function on wireless internet connectivity, which entails issues of limited bandwidth and network congestion. Hence, the primary focus of Web applications in MCC is on improving performance by quickly fulfilling customer's requests to improve service satisfaction. This paper investigates a new approach to caching data in these applications using Redis, an in-memory data store, to enhance Quality of Service. We highlight the two implementation approaches of fetching the data of an application either directly from the database or from the cache. Our experimental analysis shows that, based on performance metrics such as response time, throughput, latency, and number of hits, the caching approach achieves better performance by speeding up the data retrieval by up to four times. This improvement is of significant importance in mobile devices considering their limitation of network bandwidth and wireless connectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".