MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200408064 · doi:10.14267/retp2021.04.20

Isten veled, fölényes vezetés! ... Isten hozott, ösztönző menedzsment! : Henry Mintzberg: Esti mesék menedzsereknek (Pallas Athéné Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 2019) című könyvének összefoglalója

2021· article· hu· W4200408064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Póta Krisztián

Bibliographic record

VenueKöz-gazdaság · 2021
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Henry Mintzberg hogy Kanadában a McGill Egyetemen tanít és kutat. Ha valakinek az egyetemen volt menedzsment típusú tárgya, szinte biztosan találkozott a nevével. Modelljei így ismerősek lehetnek, azonban ebben a könyvben valami egészen másról lesz szó, más megközelítésből. 42 rövid történetet, esszét gyűjtött össze azzal a céllal, hogy jobban megismerjük a menedzsment világát. Ezeket lefekvés előtt ajánlja elolvasni, „miután a vezetés fáradalmai véget értek” [Mintzberg, 2019: 7].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKöz-gazdaságSame topicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational StudiesFrench-language works237,207