Data Pre-Processing of Infrared Spectral Breathprints for Lung Cancer Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Though breath analysis shows promise as a noninvasive and cost-effective approach to lung cancer screening, biomarkers in exhaled breath samples can be overwhelmed by irrelevant internal and environmental volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These extraneous VOCs can obscure the disease signature in a spectral breathprint, hindering the performance of pattern recognition models. In this work, pre-processing pipelines consisting of missing value replacement, detrending, and normalization techniques were evaluated to reduce these effects and enhance the features of interest in infrared cavity ring-down spectra. The best performing pipeline consisted of moving average detrending, linear interpolation for missing values, and vector normalization. This model achieved an average accuracy of 73.04% across five types of classifiers, exhibiting an 8.36% improvement compared to a baseline model (p < 0.05). A linear support vector machine classifier yielded the best performance (79.75% accuracy, 67.74% sensitivity, 87.50% specificity). This work can serve to guide pre-processing in future lung cancer breath research and, more broadly, in infrared laser absorption spectroscopy in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".