A new test for high‐dimensional regression coefficients in partially linear models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partially linear regression models are semiparametric models that contain both linear and nonlinear components. They are extensively used in many scientific fields for their flexibility and convenient interpretability. In such analyses, testing the significance of the regression coefficients in the linear component is typically a key focus. Under the high‐dimensional setting, i.e., “large p , small n ,” the conventional F ‐test strategy does not apply because the coefficients need to be estimated through regularization techniques. In this article, we develop a new test using a U ‐statistic of order two, relying on a pseudo‐estimate of the nonlinear component from the classical kernel method. Using the martingale central limit theorem, we prove the asymptotic normality of the proposed test statistic under some regularity conditions. We further demonstrate our proposed test's finite‐sample performance by simulation studies and by analyzing some breast cancer gene expression data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it