MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200429872 · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.11.020

Inflammatory markers, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and the symptomatic course of adolescent bipolar disorder: A prospective repeated-measures study

2021· article· en· W4200429872 on OpenAlexafffund
Sudhir Karthikeyan, Mikaela K. Dimick, Lisa Fıksenbaum, Hyunjin Jeong, Boris Birmaher, James L. Kennedy, Krista L. Lanctôt, Anthony Levitt, Gregory E. Miller, Ayal Schaffer, L. Trevor Young, Eric A. Youngstrom, Ana C. Andreazza, Benjamin I. Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior and Immunity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook HospitalOntario Brain InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of TorontoOntario Mental Health FoundationFondation Brain CanadaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health FoundationRoyal Bank of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsBipolar disorderBrain-derived neurotrophic factorPsychologyClinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicineNeurotrophic factorsCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have found elevated pro-inflammatory markers and reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) during symptomatic episodes of bipolar disorder (BD) in adults. There is a paucity of research examining these markers in youth with BD, or longitudinally in any BD age group. METHODS: 79 adolescents, ages 13-19 years, were enrolled, including 43 symptomatic adolescents with BD and 36 age-matched healthy controls (HC). Blood samples were collected from all participants at intake, and repeatedly from BD participants at pre-specified intervals over the course of two years. Serum was assayed for levels of pro-inflammatory markers (c-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin [IL]-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α]), BDNF and the anti-inflammatory marker, IL-10. Week-by-week severity of mood symptoms was assessed using semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Adolescents with BD provided an average of 4.6 blood samples, on average every 5.0 months. During the most severe symptomatic interval (i.e., highest sum of mood symptom scores) among BD adolescents, levels of CRP (p = 0.01) and pro- to anti-inflammatory ratios (CRP/IL-10; p < 0.001 and IL-6/IL-10; p = 0.046) were significantly greater, and IL-10 levels (p = 0.004) were significantly lower, vs. HC. There were no differences between BD and HC in IL-6, TNF-α or BDNF. Within BD participants, higher BDNF (p = 0.01) and IL-10 levels (p = 0.001) significantly predicted greater burden of mood symptoms over the subsequent epoch. Moreover, higher CRP levels (p = 0.009) at intake predicted greater time to recovery from the index symptomatic episode. CONCLUSIONS: In the first repeated-measures study on this topic in adolescents with BD, we found evidence that CRP, an inexpensive and ubiquitous blood test, may be useful in predicting the prospective course of BD symptoms. Future larger studies are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain Behavior and ImmunitySame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207