MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aerosol-jet printing of flexible green graphene humidity sensors for IoT applications

2021· article· en· W4200430881 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Ketabi, Ahmad Al Shboul, Shirin Mahinnezhad, Ricardo Izquierdo

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Sensors · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneMaterials scienceRelative humidityHumidityGelatinElectrodeNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsComposite materialChemistryMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research focuses on designing and developing highly sensitive flexible graphene sensors for humidity detection. First, green graphene inks were prepared with triton X-100 (Ge-GTr) as a dispersant and loaded gelatin as a binder. Then, flexible graphene sensors were fabricated by printing the graphene inks with aerosol-jet on top of screen-printed carbon electrodes. High gelatin-modified sensors (0.5Ge-GTr and 1Ge-GTr) exhibited a good linear response in relative humidity (RH) range of 30%RH–90%RH with a good sensitivity of 0.55/%RH at 25°C and with fast response in a second range. Moreover, they showed good stability to temperature fluctuation ranged from 22°C to 70°C. The humidity sensing mechanism depends on the surface coverage of graphene by the hydrophilic coating. The electrons transfer can explain the sensing mechanism for sensors of GTr, and 0.1Ge-GTr. In contrast, sensors' response could be better explained by gelatin swelling for 0.25Ge-GTr, 0.5Ge-GTr, and 1Ge-GTr sensors upon humidity detection. The proposed humidity sensors (0.5Ge-GTr and 1Ge-GTr) are green, highly sensitive, and with a fast response to human breathing, making them good candidates for healthcare applications such as respiration sensors for facial masks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE SensorsSame topicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsFrench-language works237,207