Application of Geographic Information Systems and Sediment Routing Methods in Sediment Mapping in Krueng Jreu Sub-Watershed, Aceh Province, Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Land management in the Krueng Jreu sub-watershed (Aceh Province, Indonesia) that did not follow soil and water conservation methods encouraged erosion. This can lead to silting of rivers or irrigation canals due to sediment deposition. Limited tools were the main reason for the infrequent measurement and mapping of these sediments in watersheds. Therefore, this study aims to conduct sedimentary mapping using GIS techniques combined with the sediment routing method to successfully produce a map of sediment assessment criteria for the Krueng Jreu sub-watershed area from 2010 to 2019. Rainfall and spatial data from the Krueng Jreu sub-watershed were analyzed to obtain several parameters of surface runoff, peak discharge, erodibility, slope, the value of ground cover, and land management. The results show that the Krueng Jreu sub-watershed was included in the wet climate type. The type of land use classification of savanna accounted for the most significant runoff, and land use type of open soil gave the smallest runoff. The maximum erosion found in the secondary dryland forest type land classification. It was known that the type of secondary dryland forest land use was the most significant contributor to sediment occurrence in the Krueng Jreu sub-watershed area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it