MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200443088 · doi:10.1002/crso.20165

Nutrient Stewardship: Taking 4R Further

2021· article· en· W4200443088 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Bruulsema

Bibliographic record

VenueCrops & Soils · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Canadian institutionsPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)Process (computing)Reading (process)Environmental stewardshipNutrientComputer scienceAgricultural engineeringEngineering managementBusinessPolitical scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceEngineeringBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It’s been 10 years since the 4R Plant Nutrition manual was published, setting out principles for the stewardship of plant nutrients agreed to by soil fertility scientists and crop nutrition practitioners. Since then, the industry has done a lot to implement the concept, both globally and in North America. What has been learned and accomplished in the process? What needs to be done to take 4R further? Earn 1 CEU in Nutrient Management by reading this article and taking the quiz at https://bit.ly/3potolp . View all CEUs online at https://web.sciencesocieties.org/Learning‐Center/Courses .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrops & SoilsSame topicPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsFrench-language works237,207