Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div>This report will investigate the interactions regarding a cable pulley system within the nose landing gear. There is the possibility of tension drops occurring within this system. A test was done to determine the tension values within the system, this test was to isolate two possibilities that could</div><div>cause the tension drop. These two possibilities were structural deflection within the nose landing gear or the tension loss occurring within the pulley cluster. With this test it was found that there are in fact tension drops when the pulley cluster was used on a rigid system without the structural deformations of the nose landing gear. There are some discrepancies where a basic cable test was done without the pulley cluster and no tension drop was found. This would lead to an investigation to occur after this test</div><div>to determine why the tension drop happens with the cable and pulley cluster interaction. Some reasons to the tension drop within the pulley cluster would be unwinding of the cable as well as deformation occurring. There is however no definite answer for the tension drop as the observation was difficult within such a confined and small space of the pulley cluster.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".