MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200451346 · doi:10.4324/9781003246756-9

Queering the Colonial in Shyam Selvadurai's Swimming in the Monsoon Sea

2021· book-chapter· en· W4200451346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tuli Chatterji

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismMonsoonArtGeographyOceanographyArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In my paper “Queering the Colonial” I will analyze Sri-Lankan-Canadian novelist Shyam Selvadurai’s novel Swimming in the Monsoon Sea (2005) to facilitate a discussion where a diasporic heterosexual intervention enables South Asian queer discursive spaces initiate new alliances with heteronormativity that blur the boundaries between homosexuality/heterosexuality. Further, my study will help reflect on how a return to pre-colonial South Asian architecture – an amalgamation of styles from Greece, Afghanistan, and India – can expand the idea of a global South Asia across time and space. In my article I will show that the colonial silencing of a two-thousand-year-old civilization was never complete; it is only through a strategic negotiation with a pre-colonial past that postcolonial South Asia can initiate non-reductive non-western epistemologies of understanding South Asian queer and female. While examining how South Asian homosociality complicates western attitudes toward queerness, I will also extend the conversation to show a shift in power when teenage Amrith de-centers Othello and defies traditional portrayal of women, for instance, of a passive Desdemona. Drawing on South Asian feminist, queer, and postcolonial theories, the paper will negotiate across different borders, critique extant colonial ideologies, and open up new interpretive frameworks of understanding postcolonial South Asian literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ IssuesFrench-language works237,207