MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200454015 · doi:10.1002/adem.202100972

A Metallic Additively Manufactured Metamaterial for Enhanced Monitoring of Acoustic Cavitation‐Based Therapeutic Ultrasound

2021· article· en· W4200454015 on OpenAlexaff
Luzhen Nie, D.A. Hutchins, Lorenzo Astolfi, Timothy P. Cooper, Adam T. Clare, C.J. Adams, Richard L. Watson, Peter J. Thomas, David M. J. Cowell, James R. McLaughlan, Stefano Laureti, Marco Ricci, Steven Freear

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicUltrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of LeedsRoyal Academy of Engineering
KeywordsMicrobubblesMaterials scienceAcousticsUltrasoundCavitationTransducerSubharmonicSIGNAL (programming language)AttenuationOpticsNonlinear systemComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combination of ultrasound and microbubbles allows treatment of indications that would be impossible or too risk adverse with conventional surgery. During treatment, subharmonic and ultraharmonic components that can only be generated from microbubbles are of great interest for intraoperative monitoring. However, the microbubble emissions are several orders of magnitude lower in power compared to that of the fundamental frequency component from the ultrasound applicator, resulting in a low signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) for monitoring. A 3D acoustic metamaterial (AMM) immersed in water is proposed for suppressing unwanted ultrasound waves, which allows the improved sensitivity for detecting weak microbubble emissions. Numerically, the importance of shear waves on the AMM transfer properties is highlighted, though only longitudinal ultrasound waves are transmitted through water. Experimentally, the design is implemented in titanium using additive manufacturing, with an attenuation level of 40 dB at the fundamental frequency. Consequently, the application of the AMM efficiently improves the SNR for subharmonic and ultraharmonic microbubble emissions by 11.8 and 11.9 dB, respectively. The subharmonic components originally overwhelmed by noise are recovered. This is the first time that AMMs have been applied to passive acoustic monitoring and this work stands to improve treatment outcomes from cavitation‐mediated focused ultrasound therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Engineering MaterialsSame topicUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207