Chronic stroke sensorimotor impairment is related to smaller hippocampal volumes: An ENIGMA analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Persistent sensorimotor impairments after stroke can negatively impact quality of life. The hippocampus is involved in sensorimotor behavior but has not been widely studied within the context of post-stroke upper limb sensorimotor impairment. The hippocampus is vulnerable to secondary degeneration after stroke, and damage to this region could further weaken sensorimotor circuits, leading to greater chronic sensorimotor impairment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cross-sectional association between non-lesioned hippocampal volume and upper limb sensorimotor impairment in people with chronic stroke. We hypothesized that smaller ipsilesional hippocampal volumes would be associated with worse upper-limb sensorimotor impairment. Cross-sectional T1-weighted brain MRIs were pooled from 357 participants at the chronic stage after stroke (>180 days post-stroke) compiled from 18 research cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Stroke Recovery Working Group (age: median = 61 years, interquartile range = 18, range = 23-93; 135 women and 222 men). Sensorimotor impairment was estimated from the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity scores. Robust mixed-effects linear models were used to test associations between post-stroke sensorimotor impairment and hippocampal volumes (ipsilesional and contralesional separately; Bonferroni-corrected, p - value < 0.025), controlling for age, sex, lesion volume, and lesioned hemisphere. We also performed an exploratory analysis to test whether sex differences influence the relationship between sensorimotor impairment and hippocampal volume. Upper limb sensorimotor impairment was positively associated with ipsilesional ( p = 0.005; d = 0.33) but not contralesional ( p = 0.96; d = 0.01) hippocampal volume, such that impairment was worse for participants with smaller ipsilesional hippocampal volume. This association remained significant independent of lesion volume or other covariates ( p = 0.001; d = 0.36). Evidence indicates an interaction between sensorimotor impairment and sex for both ipsilesional ( p = 0.008; d = −0.29) and contralesional ( p = 0.006; d = −0.30) hippocampal volumes, whereby women showed progressively worsening sensorimotor impairment with smaller hippocampal volumes compared to men. The present study has identified a novel association between chronic post-stroke sensorimotor impairment and ipsilesional, but not contralesional, hippocampal volume. This finding was not due to lesion size and may be stronger in women. We also provide supporting evidence that smaller hippocampal volume post-stroke is likely a consequence of ipsilesional damage, which could provide a link between vascular disease and other disorders, such as dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".