Referencialidad, funcionamiento y simbolismo ideológico del Norte y del Sur en A Better Life y Africa Paradis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo, consideramos que la configuración geopolítica del mundo viene determinada por nuevos paradigmas en las relaciones Norte-Sur. Cuestionamos la manera cómo se construyen el Norte y el Sur en A Better Life de Chris Weitz y Africa Paradis de Sylvestre Amoussou. Este cuestionamiento nos permite resaltar significados simbólicos e ideológicos de estos dos relatos fílmicos de inmigración contemporánea. Apoyándonos en las aportaciones teóricas de Henri Mitterand y Jacques Soubeyroux sobre el análisis del espacio, organizamos nuestro análisis en tres etapas. Después de realizar una topografía mimética de los relatos, enfocamos, en segundo lugar, la atención en el Norte y el Sur como espacios diegéticos para destacar sus significados en relación con las acciones de los sujetos migrantes. Luego, analizamos el simbolismo ideológico de los mismos espacios, determinando los factores que mandan esta polarización. Concluimos que ya no impera la lógica geográfica de los puntos cardinales en esta polarización norte-sur, sino y sobre todo la lógica hegemónica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".