MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200469915 · doi:10.46300/9106.2021.15.187

Higher Derivatives and Polynomials of the Standard Nield-Kuznetsov Function of the First Kind

2021· article· en· W4200469915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal Processing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAiry functionFunction (biology)MathematicsOrdinary differential equationWork (physics)Special functionsSchrödinger's catDifferential equationDifferential (mechanical device)Applied mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysisPure mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this fundamental work, higher derivatives of the standard Nield-Kuznetsov function of the first kind, and the polynomials arising from this function and Airy’s functions, are derived and discussed. This work provides background theoretical material and computational procedures for the arising polynomials and the higher derivatives of the recently introduced Nield-Kuznetsov function, which has filled a gap that existed in the literature since the nineteenth century. The ease by which the inhomogeneous Airy’s equation can now be solved is an advantage offered by the Nield-Kuznetsov functions. The current analysis might prove to be invaluable in the study of inhomogeneous Schrodinger, Tricomi, and Spark ordinary differential equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it