MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200470300 · doi:10.1177/01926233211056859

Proteomic Analysis of Subchronic Furan Exposure in the Liver of Male Fischer F344 Rats

2021· article· en· W4200470300 on OpenAlexaff
Santokh Gill, Meghan Kavanagh, Christine Poirier, Ruixi Xie, Terry Koerner

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicologic Pathology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToxicogenomicsToxicokineticsProteolysisBiologyHistopathologyPhysiologyToxicityInternal medicineMetabolismEndocrinologyPharmacologyPathologyBiochemistryMedicineGene expressionEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

344 rats exposed to various doses by gavage to determine the NOAEL. Previous reports have outlined changes in the liver using gross necropsy examination, histopathology, clinical biochemistry, hematology, immunohistochemistry, and toxicogenomics. The data revealed that males were more sensitive than females. The focus of this study was to evaluate the toxicoproteomic changes by 2-dimensional differential in gel electrophoresis followed by mass spectrometry analysis. To compliment previous studies, protein expression changes were evaluated of male animals after 90 days of exposure to doses of 0, 0.03, 0.5, and 8.0 mg/kg bw/d. Significant statistical treatment-related changes compared to the controls identified 45 protein spots containing 38 unique proteins. Proteins identified are implicated in metabolism, redox regulation, protein folding/proteolysis as well as structural and transport proteins. At lower doses, multiple cytoprotective pathways are activated to maintain a homeostasis but ultimately the loss of protein function and impairment of several pathways could lead to adverse health effects at higher doses of furan administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicologic PathologySame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207