MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Partial Power Processing MMC Topology for Direct AC/AC Power Conversion

2021· article· en· W4200481523 on OpenAlexaff
Anjana Wijesekera, Yuan Li, Gregory J. Kish

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE 22nd Workshop on Control and Modelling of Power Electronics (COMPEL) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designCapacitorController (irrigation)Topology (electrical circuits)Power (physics)Computer scienceVoltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringAC powerEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new class of modular multilevel ac/ac converter (M2AC) is presented that allows the direct conversion of ac power between different voltage levels in single frequency power systems using half-bridge submodules. The M2AC is a partial power processing topology that exploits internal circulating dc currents to facilitate the charge balance of the submodule capacitors. A comparison with the conventional back-to-back modular multilevel ac/ac converter shows the M2AC can realize significant reductions in submodule requirements. The working principle of the M2AC and its partial power processing mechanism is discussed in detail. A dynamic controller is proposed that includes output current regulation and capacitor voltage balancing. The M2AC operation and controls are validated by simulation, and experimental results for a 135/67 Vrms, 0.8 kW prototype confirm efficacy of the partial power processing mechanism. Potential applications of the M2AC include voltage regulators in distribution and transmission systems, and deployment as part of power flow controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE 22nd Workshop on Control and Modelling of Power Electronics (COMPEL)Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207