Work-Family Conflict and Family Satisfaction: Evidence From Small Enterprise Managers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The adult person is involved in managing family responsibilities and maintaining work activities on a daily basis. This creates conflict between work and family with implications for family satisfaction. Nonetheless, small-scale enterprises managers’ level of resilience could alter these implications. The objective of the study is to examine the effect of work-family conflicts on family satisfaction, by moderating the role of resilience. A cross-sectional design was applied to a sample of 293 managers. ANOVA results reveal that work-family conflict and family-work conflict are positive and significantly related but each has a significant negative relationship with family satisfaction. However, resilience positively and significantly moderates each of the effects of work-family and family-work conflicts on family satisfaction. Thus, increasing levels of the conflicts come with increasing levels of resilience to overcome work-family conflicts. This is the first study in Ghana to show that resilience has a significant role in mitigating the difficulties of work-family conflicts. It is recommended that policy-makers bring in resilience training interventions to reduce role conflicts and increase family satisfaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".