Pair Selection Optimization for InSAR Time Series Processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ever-increasing amount of SAR data motivates the development of automatic processing chains to fully exploit the opportunities offered by these large databases. The InSAR Mass processing Toolbox for Multidimensional time series (MasTer) is an optimized tool to automatically download SAR data, select the interferometric pairs, perform the interferometric mass processing, compute the geocoded deformation maps, invert and display the velocity maps and the 2D time series on a web page updated incrementally as soon as a new image is available. New challenges relate to data management and processing load. We address them through methodological improvements dedicated to optimizing the InSAR pair selection. The proposed algorithm narrows the classical selection based on the shortest temporal and spatial baselines thanks to a coherence proxy and balances the use of each image as Primary and Secondary images thanks to graph theory methods. We apply the processing to three volcanic areas characterized with different climate, vegetation and deformation characteristics: the Virunga Volcanic Province (DR Congo), the Reunion Island (France) and the Domuyo and Laguna del Maule area (Chile-Argentina border). Compared to pair selection based solely on baseline criteria, this new tool produces similar velocity maps while reducing the total number of computed differential InSAR interferograms by up to 75\%, which drastically reduces the computation time. The optimization also allows to reduce the influence of DEM errors and atmospheric phase screen, which increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the inverted displacement time series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".