MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200510288 · doi:10.18296/em.0065

Global challenges in securing equity and human rights: Re-envisioning the role for evaluation in the contemporary HIV/AIDS epidemic

2021· article· en· W4200510288 on OpenAlex
Robin Lin Miller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEvaluation Matters—He Take Tō Te Aromatawai · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Human rightsEquity (law)VirologyPolitical scienceEconomic growthDevelopment economicsMedicineEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kia ora. It is an honour to join you in this important discussion of evaluation's role and contribution to creating equitable societies. I am speaking to you from my current hometown of Okemos, Michigan, in the United States (US) rather than, as I had hoped, in a conference meeting room in Rotorua. Okemos is rightfully Ojibwe tribal land. Chief Okemos, after whom the town is named, was the Ojibwe chief who represented his people when they, along with the Ottawa and Potawatomi, were forced to yield their territory to the US government in the 1819 Treaty of Saginaw. Michigan State University also sits on the forcibly surrendered lands of the Three Fires Confederacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it