Numerical investigation on early age performance of ultra-high-performance concrete shear keys between an adjacent prestressed concrete box beams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adjacent precast prestressed concrete box beam bridges have been widely utilized for decades and have shown satisfactory performance. However, significant issues regarding to the longitudinal shear key cracking have been noted by bridge maintenance personnel. The cracks are typically initiated at beam-shear key interfaces due to shrinkage and temperature and propagate due to applied load. Recently, ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) was employed in the shear keys with the anticipation to prevent joint cracking. Although the field-collected data at early age from bridge utilizing UHPC shear keys indicated promising performance, the results only reflected the early age joint behavior at locations which were instrumented during the field test. In the current study, a 3D finite element (FE) model was developed to calculate the early age stresses due to shrinkage and temperature. The results indicated that the UHPC material associated with a specific shear key configuration created a “self-locked” phenomenon that generated compression on the upper level shear key. The early age tensile stress during the first couple of days near the end of the joint was relatively small compared to the tensile strength of UHPC material. Although the interface had sufficient capacity to resist the early age stresses, it is still a critical component and needs to be designed with sufficient capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it