Viability of a hybrid desalinisation system using concentrated photovoltaics receivers to power seawater desalination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concentrator PhotoVoltaics (CPV) may generate considerable heat as a byproduct in addition to power. Using that heat as concentrated solar power (CSP) to thermally desalinate salt water would allow for value addition in arid regions by supplementing produced electricity with fresh water. This paper discusses the primary trade-off between the net electricity amount and the net distilled water amount, both of which are desirable products in a hybrid concentrated photovoltaic and thermal system (CPV-T). While higher temperatures promote freshwater generation, they also cause a quick fall in cell efficiency, reducing the quantity of power generated and causing cell deterioration. The CPV-T receiver, which is partially covered with cells and then supplementary heated in a cell-free portion, is modeled and established. Furthermore, simple-stage and multistage desalination unit models are presented, linked to the receiver, and examined to cope with the reduced temperature limits of this receiver. The results demonstrate a CPV-T receiver's ability to generate both electrical power and freshwater, while also demonstrating that the cell temperature constraint can become quite important beyond 50% of the receiver surface coverage. These first order results establish the system's validity and potential and will aid the system designer in the initial system design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".