Tecnología, desarraigo, y prácticas focales
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El filósofo americano-alemán contemporáneo Albert Borgmann describe las sociedades modernas como estructuradas sobre un paradigma tecnológico basado en el consumo, el desarraigo de la realidad y la falta de compromiso. Como reacción a este paradigma, Borgmann indica la necesidad de establecer prácticas alrededor de cosas focales que den centro al mundo personal y social, dándole un sentido pleno, y que fomenten la buena vida. En 1993, el filósofo americano Patrick Dust contrastó el pensamiento de Borgmann con el de Ortega y Gasset, sugiriendo que Ortega presenta ideas más claras y útiles para comprender la tecnología. Este artículo, en cambio, propone que las filosofías de Ortega y Borgmann coinciden en gran medida, ya que los dos presentan la misma solución al problema tecnológico contemporáneo basada en el cultivo de prácticas focales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it