XAB2 Dynamics during DNA Damage-Dependent Transcription Inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Xeroderma Pigmentosum group A (XPA)-binding protein 2 (XAB2) is a multi-functional protein that plays a critical role in distinct cellular processes including transcription, splicing, DNA repair and mRNA export. In this study, we detailed XAB2 involvement during Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER), a repair pathway that guarantees genome integrity against UV light-induced DNA damage and that specifically removes transcription-blocking damage in a dedicated process known as Transcription-Coupled repair (TC-NER). Here, we demonstrated that XAB2 is involved specifically and exclusively in TC-NER reaction and solely for RNA Polymerase 2 transcribed genes. Surprisingly, contrary to all the other NER proteins studied so far, XAB2 does not accumulate on the local UV-C damage but on the contrary is remobilized after damage induction. This fast change in mobility is restored when DNA repair reactions are completed. By scrutinizing from which cellular complex/partner/structure XAB2 is released, we have identified that XAB2 is detached after DNA damage induction from the DNA:RNA hybrids, commonly known as R-loops, and from the CSA and XPG protein and this release is thought to contribute to the DNA damage recognition step during TC-NER. Importantly, we have disclosed a role for XAB2 in retaining RNAP2 on its substrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".