MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200532847 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037494

Accreting protoplanets: Spectral signatures and magnitude of gas and dust extinction at H<i>α</i>

2021· article· en· W4200532847 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel-Dominique Marleau, Yuhiko Aoyama, R. Kuiper, Katherine B. Follette, N. Turner, Gabriele Cugno, C. F. Manara, Sebastiaan Y. Haffert, Daniel Kitzmann, Simon C. Ringqvist, Kevin Wagner, R. van Boekel, Steph Sallum, M. Janson, T. O. B. Schmidt, L. Venuti, C. Lovis, C. Mordasini

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersJet Propulsion LaboratoryAmes Research CenterMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungEuropean CommissionCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationScience Mission DirectorateUniversities Space Research AssociationKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAccretion (finance)Radiative transferOpacityExtinction (optical mineralogy)AstronomyInterstellar mediumGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context.Accreting planetary-mass objects have been detected at Hα, but targeted searches have mainly resulted in non-detections. Accretion tracers in the planetary-mass regime could originate from the shock itself, making them particularly susceptible to extinction by the accreting material. High-resolution (R> 50 000) spectrographs operating at Hαshould soon enable one to study how the incoming material shapes the line profile. Aims.We calculate how much the gas and dust accreting onto a planet reduce the Hαflux from the shock at the planetary surface and how they affect the line shape. We also study the absorption-modified relationship between the Hαluminosity and accretion rate. Methods.We computed the high-resolution radiative transfer of the Hαline using a one-dimensional velocity–density–temperature structure for the inflowing matter in three representative accretion geometries: spherical symmetry, polar inflow, and magnetospheric accretion. For each, we explored the wide relevant ranges of the accretion rate and planet mass. We used detailed gas opacities and carefully estimated possible dust opacities. Results.At accretion rates ofṀ≲ 3 × 10−6 MJyr−1, gas extinction is negligible for spherical or polar inflow and at mostAHα≲ 0.5 mag for magnetospheric accretion. Up toṀ≈ 3 × 10−4 MJyr−1, the gas contributesAHα≲ 4 mag. This contribution decreases with mass. We estimate realistic dust opacities at Hαto beκ~ 0.01–10 cm2g−1, which is 10–104times lower than in the interstellar medium. Extinction flattens theLHα–Ṁrelationship, which becomes non-monotonic with a maximum luminosityLHα~ 10−4 L⊙towardsṀ≈ 10−4 MJyr−1for a planet mass ~10 MJ. In magnetospheric accretion, the gas can introduce features in the line profile, while the velocity gradient smears them out in other geometries. Conclusions.For a wide part of parameter space, extinction by the accreting matter should be negligible, simplifying the interpretation of observations, especially for planets in gaps. At highṀ, strong absorption reduces the Hαflux, and some measurements can be interpreted as twoṀvalues. Highly resolved line profiles (R~ 105) can provide (complex) constraints on the thermal and dynamical structure of the accretion flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207