MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200539784 · doi:10.1002/9781119713173.ch7

Renewable Energy Systems with Thermal Energy Storage

2021· other· en· W4200539784 on OpenAlexaff
İbrahim Dinçer, Marc A. Rosen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyEnergy storageIntermittent energy sourceEnvironmental scienceThermal energy storagePumped-storage hydroelectricityWind powerSolar energyCompressed air energy storageGrid energy storageEnergy developmentEnergy recoveryProcess engineeringThermal energyEnergy engineeringDistributed generationEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diversifying energy supplies by employing renewable energy sources and integrating them with appropriate energy storage options can assist in shifting toward energy sustainability. Solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and ocean sources are used commonly for providing electricity and heat. Energy storage technologies have become increasingly necessary for expanding the range of use and efficiency of the energy systems, given the intermittency of solar and wind energy sources. Thermal energy storage systems provide a useful option for energy systems, for integrating renewable energy sources and for achieving more efficient and sustainable systems. In chemical storage, energy storage occurs by taking advantage of the energy interactions associated with chemical reactions. The chapter presents three case studies to illustrate how energy storage can operate in conjunction with renewable energy systems. These include: solar energy system with thermal energy storage, solar energy-based system with compressed air energy storage, and combining wind and current turbines with pumped hydro storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207