MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200558777 · doi:10.1002/ana.26103

Issue Information

2021· paratext· en· W4200558777 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth L. Tyler, Clifford B. Saper, Daisuke Ito, Ana Podcasts, Megan Richie, Adeline Goss, Safwan Jaradeh, Carlo W. Cereda, Giovanni Bianco, Michael Mlynash, Nicole Yuen, Abid Qureshi, Archana Hinduja, Seena Dehkharghani, Adam Goldman-Yassen, Kevin Li, Chun Hsieh, Dan‐Victor Giurgiutiu, Dan Gibson, Emmanuel Carrera, Fana Alemseged, Tobias D. Faizy, Jens Fiehler, Marco Pileggi, Bruce Campbell, Gregory W. Albers, Jeremy J. Heit, Carlo Wilke, Selina Reich, John C. van Swieten, Barbara Borroni, Raquel Sánchez‐Valle, Fermín Moreno, Robert Laforce, Caroline Graff, Daniela Galimberti, James B. Rowe, Mario Masellis, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Elizabeth Finger, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Fabrizio Tagliavini, Isabel Santana, Simon Ducharme, Christopher Butler, Alexander Gerhard, Johannes Levin, Adrian Danek, Markus Otto, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Roberta Ghidoni, Sandro Sorbi, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Matthis Synofzik, Cindy Bokobza, Pooja Joshi, Anne‐Laure Schang, Zsolt Csaba, Valérie Faivre, Amélie Montané, Anne Galland, Anouk Benmamar‐Badel, Emmanuelle Bosher, Sophie Lebon, Leslie Schwendimann, Shyamala Mani, Pascal Dournaud, Valérie C. Besson, Bobbi Fleiss, Pierre Gressèns, Juliette Van Steenwinckel, Amanda Chan, Yi Lin Wong, Yao Chong, San Lai, Luen Teoh, Alison Ying Ying Ng, Jennifer Hung, Yee Kwan Chan, Kay Wei Ping Ng, Joy Vijayan, Jonathan Ong, Bharatendu Chandra, C.-L. Tan, Nurul H. Rutt, Myen Tan, Hafizah Ismail, Herbert Schwarz, Hyungwon Choi, Vijay K. Sharma, Anselm Mak

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurology · 2021
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnalsCitationComputer scienceInformation retrievalLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebHistoryClassics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wiley's Corporate Citizenship initiative seeks to address the environmental, social, economic, and ethical challenges faced in our business and which are important to our diverse stakeholder groups.Since launching the initiative, we have focused on sharing our content with those in need, enhancing community philanthropy, reducing our carbon impact, creating global guidelines and best practices for paper use, establishing a vendor code of ethics, and engaging our colleagues and other stakeholders in our efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9140.902

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of NeurologySame topicBiotin and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207