MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200572378 · doi:10.36838/v3i5.8

Carbon-derived Substrate Accelerated the Biodegradation of Low-density Polyethylene

2021· article· en· W4200572378 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Crystal Radinski

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of high school research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodegradationSubstrate (aquarium)PolyethyleneCarbon fibersMaterials scienceChemical engineeringLow-density polyethyleneComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistryEcologyEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plastic is a commonly used carbon-based product that poses a major environmental pollution hazard due to its poor biodegradability. The natural environment is rich in organic carbon sources. Only few microorganisms have developed abilities to disintegrate heavy plastic molecules, and their lytic capabilities are generally poor. Microorganisms select carbon molecules that require less energy to digest. As bacteria are highly adaptable organisms, it is hypothesized that bacterial plastic biodegradation activity could be stimulated by limiting carbon sources to plastic and forcing bacteria to upregulate necessary metabolic pathways. Bacteria with natural abilities to decompose plastic from three different ecosystems in Alberta, Canada (forest, river, and farm) were cultured in an artificially created environment with limited carbon access. Pseudomonas sp. demonstrated the ability to accelerate LDPE biodegradation from 1.39% in carbon-saturated to 21.335% in carbon-restricted mediums in three months. The results of our study suggest that plastic pollution could be reduced by increasing its biodegradation in dedicated composters. Finding a solution to the overwhelming waste issue is critical to the planet's health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of high school researchSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207