Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours de la révolution tunisienne, démarrée fin 2010, les rapports sociaux de sexe sont redéfinis par la participation massive des femmes aux protestations. Dans ce contexte, une lutte d’ouvrières, singulière tant par sa durée que par ses modes d’organisation et d’actions, se déroule de 2011 à 2014 dans une filiale d’une multinationale française. Pour faire face aux conditions de travail déplorables : humiliations, harcèlements sexuels, horaires extensifs, etc., les ouvrières s’organisent sous la bannière de la principale centrale syndicale du pays, l’Union générale tunisienne du travail. Quasi exclusivement féminin, le syndicat de base, en privilégiant un fonctionnement et des modes d’action inclusifs et peu hiérarchisés, libère la parole et permet de déplacer les lignes du genre. Centrée sur les deux leadeuses syndicales dotées de dispositions à l’engagement qui se réactualisent et se transforment au contact de l’événement, cet article montre aussi comment sont mobilisés des registres d’action divers du fait du rapport ambivalent de la lutte aux structures syndicales et de sa radicalisation face à une répression patronale de plus en plus dure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.599 | 0.403 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".