MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200580008 · doi:10.3390/electronics10233026

Effective Voting Ensemble of Homogenous Ensembling with Multiple Attribute-Selection Approaches for Improved Identification of Thyroid Disorder

2021· article· en· W4200580008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature selectionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceRandom forestThyroidPattern recognition (psychology)Boosting (machine learning)Machine learningDecision treeEnsemble learningVotingInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thyroid disease is characterized by abnormal development of glandular tissue on the periphery of the thyroid gland. Thyroid disease occurs when this gland produces an abnormally high or low level of hormones, with hyperthyroidism (active thyroid gland) and hypothyroidism (inactive thyroid gland) being the two most common types. The purpose of this work was to create an efficient homogeneous ensemble of ensembles in conjunction with numerous feature-selection methodologies for the improved detection of thyroid disorder. The dataset employed is based on real-time thyroid information obtained from the District Head Quarter (DHQ) teaching hospital, Dera Ghazi (DG) Khan, Pakistan. Following the necessary preprocessing steps, three types of attribute-selection strategies; Select From Model (SFM), Select K-Best (SKB), and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) were used. Decision Tree (DT), Gradient Boosting (GB), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF) classifiers were used as promising feature estimators. The homogeneous ensembling activated the bagging- and boosting-based classifiers, which were then classified by the Voting ensemble using both soft and hard voting. Accuracy, sensitivity, mean square error, hamming loss, and other performance assessment metrics have been adopted. The experimental results indicate the optimum applicability of the proposed strategy for improved thyroid ailment identification. All of the employed approaches achieved 100% accuracy with a small feature set. In terms of accuracy and computational cost, the presented findings outperformed similar benchmark models in its domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it