Energy-Efficient Interactive 360° Video Streaming with Real-Time Gaze Tracking on Mobile Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
360° videos are becoming one of the major media in recent years, providing immersive experience for viewers with more interactions compared to traditional videos. Most of today’s implementations rely on bulky Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs) or require touch screen operations for interactive display, which are not only expensive but also inconvenient for viewers. In this paper, we demonstrate that interactive 360° video streaming can be done with hints from gaze movement detected by the front camera of today’s mobile devices (e.g., a smartphone). We design a lightweight real-time gaze point tracking method for this purpose. Using only the front camera, our solution detects the users’ faces by a lightweight Haar-like cascaded classifier, measures the user’s face-to-screen distance and sight angle, and then derives the location of the user’s gaze point following a customized triangularity model. We integrate it with streaming module and apply a dynamic margin adaption algorithm to minimize the overall energy consumption for battery-constrained mobile devices. Our experiments on state-of-the-art smartphones show the feasibility of our solution and its energy efficiency toward cost-effective real-time 360° video streaming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".