MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200595858 · doi:10.33177/11.3

THE LIBERATIONIST THINKING IN OCEANIA: CARTOGRAPHY OF CIRCULATION OF LATIN AMERICAN IDEAS IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC

2021· article· en· W4200595858 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Eduardo Devés

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia/AméricaLatina · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad del Bío-BíoUniversity of the PhilippinesNational Centre for Vocational Education ResearchMcGill University
KeywordsCirculation (fluid dynamics)Latin AmericansGeographyOceanographyHistoryCartographyPolitical scienceGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research consists of detecting the presence from the 1970s until the beginning of the 21st century, of two expressions of South American liberationist thinking (Paulo Freire's pedagogy and theology of liberation) in Oceania.Intellectual reception ecosystems and processes of circulation and re-elaboration are indicated in 4 intellectual spaces: higher education institutions (universities and religious seminaries), liberation movements, adult literacy, and indigenous peoples' organizations.Cases are detected in states and territories such as Australia, Fiji, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Timor East, and Vanuatu.Finally, this research concludes with the characterization of the ways in which the South American ideas were received and re-elaborated and the channels through which they arrived in the region and through which they circulated within it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia/AméricaLatinaSame topicCultural and Social Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207