MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Critical Surface Tension and Specific Surface Free Energy of Clathrate Hydrate

2021· article· en· W4200603181 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu Wei, Nobuo Maeda

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsClathrate hydrateSurface tensionHydrateSurface energyFree surfaceMaterials scienceThermodynamicsChemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The specific surface free energy (γ sv ) of a solid is the work required to create a unit area of a solid in a vacuum. γ sv is a fundamental physical quantity that plays a central role in cohesion, adhesion, and premelting of a solid and other phenomena like the nucleation work of a solid phase. However, due to experimental difficulties, no specific surface free energy values have been reported for clathrate hydrates. Here we applied the “Zisman plot” to the determination of the critical surface tension, γ c, of ice and tetrahydrofuran (THF) hydrate. The γ c value of ice was found to be very similar to the value reported by Adamson et al. ( J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1970, 34, 461–468) for the same homologous series. Then we used the measured γ c value of THF hydrate and the γ sv values of ice reported in the literature to deduce the γ sv value of THF hydrate. The deduced γ sv value of THF hydrate was somewhat lower than that of ice and in the range from 60.4 to 124.2 mJ/m 2, with an average of 92.3 mJ/m 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207