Failure of a single day metronidazole desensitization protocol, and success of a modified two-day protocol in an outpatient setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: True allergy to metronidazole, a common anti-infective in clinical practice, is rarely reported in the literature. In the case of Trichomonas, there are few alternatives to the nitrimidazole class of drugs, and the alternatives that do exist are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Accordingly, for the rare patients with Type 1 hypersensitivity reactions to metronidazole but compelling need, desensitization protocols have been adapted previously. Reactions during these protocols appear common. Patients in previous regimens have required higher level care for observation, which is costly and resource-intensive. CASE PRESENTATION: We report here on a successful outpatient two-day regimen for metronidazole desensitization. Our patient had compelling indication for metronidazole, but reacted after receiving the very first dose of a previously described desensitization protocol. Accordingly, the protocol was adapted further. Despite this, she went on to develop objective hives prior to reaching the full intended dose. With appropriate symptom management and pre-medication on the second day in clinic, she was successfully desensitized and able to complete a week of full-dose metronidazole. No acute care resources were needed. CONCLUSION: We propose this two-day desensitization regimen for patients who react during the previously described desensitization protocols. This regimen was effective and safe, and did not necessitate the use of acute-care resources. Two-day desensitization protocols while relatively uncommon, can be successful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".