MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200606988 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10508961.1

Morphodynamic styles: a novel index of gravel-bed river behaviour

2021· preprint· en· W4200606988 on OpenAlexaff
William Booker, Brett Eaton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Space (punctuation)Hydrology (agriculture)GeologyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interaction between form and process within a river produces the variety of morphodynamics we observe in channels. This poster presents a method using a simple index of channel behaviour that quantitatively represents the style of deformation a river reach undergoes. We term this index the throughput ratio (ζ), and it is calculated by comparing the volume of morphologic change recorded during an event to the volume of sediment transported during the event. The ratio of these two volumes represents a change in behaviour from exchange-based deformation of the channel (ζ < 1) to a more resilient throughput channel state where material is sourced from upstream, does not interact with the reach in question and is transmitted through (ζ > 1). A pair of experiments that developed different morphodynamics whilst sharing the same initial width, slope, discharge and grain size were used to demonstrate this methodology and interpretation of the results. The difference in morphodynamics between the channels was due to the presence of inerodible banks in one experiment, and a freedom to widen in the other. The inclusion of fixed banks prevented the system from being able to adjust its channel cross-section as freely, and maintained a high but variable sediment throughput over the experiment. In the system with mobile banks, the channel widened and exhibited a greater capacity to store sediment inside and outside of the active channel, causing the sediment transport rate to decline to zero during the experiment. In both, the rate of morphologic change tended to zero despite their marked differences in sediment transport over time. As a result, the throughput ratios depict two contrasting evolutions of channel behaviour. The differences in trajectory are due to the processes available to each system and their feedback with channel form. This approach provides a new method of representing channel character that may act to supplement existing analyses of river behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes→French-language works237,207→