MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200606994 · doi:10.12968/joan.2021.10.10.440

Treating chronic migraines with botulinum toxin

2021· article· en· W4200606994 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Charlson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aesthetic Nursing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBotulinum toxinChronic MigraineMigraineIntensive care medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migraine is a common condition that causes significant morbidity. It is often divided into acute and chronic, but there can be overlap between those who have variable frequency acute episodes and those who have chronic migraine with 15 headache-associated days per month. Botulinum toxin is a prophylactic treatment licensed for chronic migraine, where it has been shown to be an effective and safe treatment. It requires approximately 200 units per treatment session, usually at 3-month intervals. The protocols allowing NHS treatment strictly limit its use. Patients may seek this on a private basis, and suitably qualified aesthetic clinicians who are Care Quality Commission-registered could reasonably treat patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aesthetic NursingSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207