MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200620499 · doi:10.26766/pmgp.v6i4.316

Alexithymia and addiction: the mediating role of stress

2021· article· en· W4200620499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alina Salnikova

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychosomatic Medicine and General Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGambling Behavior and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaPsychologyAddictionToronto Alexithymia ScaleClinical psychologyTest (biology)Scale (ratio)Statistical significancePsychiatryMedicineCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Gambling encourages people to want more money than they did at the beginning of the game. The growing availability and variety of games has made gambling a critical issue. Statistics show that out of 48.5 million Ukrainians, more than four million are players. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which levels of alexithymia and stress may predict pathological gambling. The study also examines the role of stress mediators in the relationship between alexithymia and addiction. Methods. The group of 123 male patients aged 18 to 64 years with a mean of 33 (SD = 11.5) participated in the study. Participants were selected from various rehabilitation centers in Kyiv. The study was conducted only with volunteers over 18 years of age who declared gambling and signed an informed consent. Measuring instruments: 1) Form of demographic information 2) South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) 3) Toronto Alexithymic Scale (TAS-20) 4) Psychological stress measure (PSM-25) 5) Lemyr-Tessier-Fillion PSM-25 scale Data were collected from individuals through online surveys as well as in person. Data were analyzed using the t-test to determine the significance of differences between groups. However, no significant difference was found. Before the participants completed the survey, it was ensured that they all signed the consent form. The data was cleaned after all the data had been entered into the computer. A total of six participants who either did not answer more than half of the questions or had deviations (-3.29> z <3.29) were excluded from the study. Results. Regression analysis showed that the amount of money betting on gambling, the total score of TAS-20 and PSM-25 significantly predicted pathological gambling. In addition, stress has a partial mediating role in the relationship between alexithymia and addiction. Conclusion. It is claimed that people with a high level of alexithymia become prone to gambling addiction due to stress. In addition to alexithymia, stress also plays an important role in the formation of addiction. In this context, this study contributes to the relevant literature by combining alexithymia, stress, and pathological gambling in conjunction with each other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychosomatic Medicine and General PracticeSame topicGambling Behavior and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207