Knowledge-Based Optimal Irrigation Scheduling of Agro-Hydrological Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agricultural irrigation consumes about 70% of freshwater globally every year. To improve the water-use efficiency in agricultural irrigation is critical as we move toward water sustainability. An irrigation scheduler determines how much water to irrigate and when to irrigate for an agricultural field. To get a high-resolution irrigation-scheduling solution for a large-scale agricultural field is still an open research problem. In this work, we propose a knowledge-based optimal irrigation-scheduling approach for large-scale agricultural fields that are equipped with center pivot irrigation systems. The proposed scheduler is designed in the framework of model predictive control. The objective of the proposed scheduler is to maximize crop yield while minimizing irrigation water consumption and the associated electricity usage. First, we introduce a structure-preserving model reduction technique to significantly reduce the dimensionality of agro-hydrological systems. Then, based on the reduced model, an optimization-based scheduler is designed. In the design of the scheduler, knowledge from farmers is taken into account to further reduce the computational complexity of the scheduler. The proposed approach explicitly considers both the irrigation time and the irrigation amount as decision variables to keep the crop within the stress-free zone considering the weather uncertainty and heterogeneous soil types for large agricultural fields. The proposed approach is applied to three different scenarios with different soil types, crops, and weather uncertainty. The results show that in all the conditions, the scheduler is capable of keeping the crops stress-free, which results in maximum yield and, at the same time, minimizes water consumption and irrigation events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".