Quelle place pour les femmes francophones dans l’histoire des savoirs infirmiers au Québec ? L’exemple du nursing psychiatrique à Montréal (1912-1963)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article entend démontrer le rôle central qu’ont joué les femmes francophones dans la construction et la transmission des savoirs psychiatriques au Québec entre 1912 et 1963. Pour ce faire, il suit le parcours d’une religieuse, sœur Augustine, directrice du nursing à l’Hôpital Saint-Jean-de-Dieu, le plus grand asile du Québec, et d’une garde-malade laïque, Charlotte Tassé, directrice propriétaire de l’Institut Albert-Prévost, une institution de soin et de formation psychiatriques située au nord de l’île de Montréal. Contre une historiographie psychiatrique, mais aussi féministe qui a renvoyé les infirmières et les hospitalières au rang de simples subalternes, cet article milite pour la reconnaissance et la réintégration de leurs apports dans l’histoire des savoirs au Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".