MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W420429685

Strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using innovative ductile composite fiber-reinforced polymer systems.

2003· article· en· W420429685 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wael F. Ragheb

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite numberComposite materialReinforced concreteFibre-reinforced plasticFiberStructural engineeringEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the technique of external strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using externally bonded Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials has been established as an effective tool for rehabilitating and strengthening reinforced concrete beams, it is still suffering from some drawbacks. A significant part of these drawbacks is attributed to the characteristics of currently available FRP strengthening systems. This study deals with the development and evaluation of the effectiveness of two innovative ductile FRP systems for flexural/shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams. The systems are fabrics that are hybrid of glass and carbon fibers and designed to have the potential to avoid most of the drawbacks experienced by currently available FRP strengthening systems. The new systems are unique as they can provide yield plateaus similar to that provided by steel in tension. The ideal characteristics of a strengthening material for both flexure and shear were investigated. A parametric study was conducted on the loading behavior of triaxially braided fabrics. Based on these investigations, the systems were designed and manufactured. An experimental investigation was conducted to evaluate the behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened in flexure/shear using the new systems. Reinforced concrete simple and continuous beams were strengthened in flexural/shear using the new systems applying different strengthening schemes. Identical beams were strengthened using some commercially available carbon fiber sheets, fabrics, and plates, as well as steel plates, in order to compare their behavior with those strengthened with the developed systems. The beams were loaded until failure and their responses were investigated for ductility, FRP exploitability, and failure modes. The beams strengthened in flexure with the new systems exhibited greater ductility than those strengthened with the carbon fiber strengthening systems and produced yield plateaus similar to those of the unstrengthened beams and also to those strengthened using steel plates. The test results showed that the strengths of the new systems were fully exploited. Guidelines for the design of the developed systems for flexural and shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams were presented. Numerical examples of reinforced concrete beams strengthened in flexure or shear were also presented in order to clarify the design procedures.Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2003 .R34. Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-10, Section: B, page: 5103. Adviser: George Abdel-Sayed. Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207