MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PO-142: Analysis of the genomic landscapes of Barbadian and Nigerian women with triple negative breast cancer

2022· article· en· W4205090859 on OpenAlexaff
Shawn M. Hercules, Xiyu Liu, Blessing Bassey‐Archibong, Desiree Skeete, Suzanne Smith Connell, Adetola Daramola, A A Banjo, Godwin Ebughe, Thomas Agan, Ima-Obong Ekanem, J Udosen, Christopher Chinedu Obiorah, Aaron C. Ojule, Michael A. Misauno, Ayuba M. Dauda, Ejike C. Egbujo, Jevon C. Hercules, Amna Ansari, Ian Brain, Christine MacColl, Yili Xu, Yuxin Jin, Sharon B. Chang, John D. Carpten, André Bédard, Gregory R. Pond, Kim Blenman, Zarko Manojlovic, Juliet M. Daniel

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriple-negative breast cancerBreast cancerOncologyBiologyCohortGermlineGenomicsCancer researchCancerGermline mutationGeneCopy-number variationInternal medicineGeneticsMedicineMutationGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Women of African ancestry (WAA) are disproportionately affected by the aggressive triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype that is often associated with high recurrence rates and metastasis. Although there is a high prevalence of TNBC across West Africa and in women of the African diaspora, there has been no comprehensive genomics study to investigate the mutational profile of ancestrally related women across the Caribbean and West Africa. To shed more light on this phenomenon, whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 31 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded TNBC tissues from ancestrally related Barbadian and Nigerian women. We compared these genomics profiles with data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for African American (TCGA-AA), European American (TCGA-EA) women with TNBC. With an average coverage of 382x for tumour samples (n= 31) and 4335x for pooled germline (n=22) non-tumor samples, the most mutated genes in our cohorts include NBPF12, PLIN4, TP53 and BRCA1. For TCGA TNBC cases, these genes had a lower mutation rate, except for TP53 (32% in our cohort; 63% in TCGA-AA; 67% in TCGA-EA). For all altered genes, there were no differences in frequency of mutations between WAA TNBC groups including the TCGA-AA cohort. Additionally, we observed a high frequency of copy number variant alterations in PIK3CA, TP53, FGFR2 and HIF1AN genes. This study provides in-depth insights into the underlying genomic alterations in WAA-TNBC samples and shines light on the importance of inclusion of non-European populations in cancer genomics and biomarker studies. Citation Format: Shawn M. Hercules, Xiyu Liu, Blessing I. Bassey-Archibong, Desiree H.A. Skeete, Suzanne Smith Connell, Adetola Daramola, Adekunbiola A.F. Banjo, Godwin Ebughe, Thomas Agan, Ima-Obong Ekanem, Joe E. Udosen, Christopher Obiorah, Aaron C. Ojule, Michael A. Misauno, Ayuba M. Dauda, Ejike C. Egbujo, Jevon C. Hercules, Amna Ansari, Ian Brain, Christine MacColl, Yili Xu, Yuxin Jin, Sharon Chang, John D. Carpten, André Bédard, Gregory R. Pond, Kim R.M. Blenman, Zarko Manojlovic, Juliet M. Daniel. Analysis of the genomic landscapes of Barbadian and Nigerian women with triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-142.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207