MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205096391 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2018.0070

We Are Aztlán!: Chicanx Histories in the Northern Borderlands by Jerry García

2018· article· en· W4205096391 on OpenAlex
Luke Sprunger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipNarrativeState (computer science)GarciaRighteousnessArgument (complex analysis)HomelandHistorySociologyArt historyLawHumanitiesPhilosophyArtLiteraturePoliticsPolitical scienceTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

129 Reviews reductive, one-dimensional trope of the Noble Savage, as was done famously for Captain Jack by Dee Brown in Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, and now again by McNally? Both perspectives are certainly emotionally satisfying to their respective audiences. Neither casts a thoughtful light on the myriad motivations and perspectives of Captain Jack, Riddle, Canby, or any other historical actor, particularly in a historical moment when Americans are confronted by analogously dangerous stereotyping and mythologizing that would have us — seemingly more and more — demonize and demean our very neighbors over structurally similar issues of culture, identity, sovereignty, and moral righteousness. Mark Axel Tveskov Southern Oregon University WE ARE AZTLÁN!: CHICANX HISTORIES IN THE NORTHERN BORDERLANDS by Jerry García Washington State University Press, Pullman, 2017. Illustrations, notes, index. 280 pages. $29.95, paper. In We are Aztlán!: Chicanx Histories in the Northern Borderlands, scholars utilize an array of approaches to better understand and describe Chicanx history in a region that editor Jerry García defines as the Pacific Northwest and the Great Lakes states of the Midwest. This eclectic volume underscores the diversity of thought in the field, highlighting scholarship that moves, in different directions, beyond traditional narratives of Mexicanancestry people in the Southwest. In the introduction, García provides background on the concept of Aztlán, a symbolic and spiritual homeland for many Mexican Americans. While he makes the case for the ongoing need for more scholarship on Chicanxs outside the Southwest, he does not extend this argument to mention the relative paucity of historical research on Central American Latinxs or highlight the need for future research from states such as Montana and the Dakotas that bridge the regions in focus in this collection. An explanation of the different terms and suffixes used to indicate ethnicity and gender would have helped make this volume more accessible to readers outside academia. In the theory-heavy first section of the book, Dionicio Valdés draws from scholarship on internal colonization to make some exceptionally poignant observations on the changing fortunes and opportunities of the U.S. working classes, the historically shifting relationships between Mexican-ancestry people, and the notion and status of whiteness. Dylan Miner draws interesting comparisons between the Canada–United States and Mexico–United States borders and looks at how government policies at both locations seek to bar the movement of people based on identity and physical appearance.. He rejects the temptation to settle on easy, dogmatic answers, asking readers “how can we think about the intersectionality of our own lives — our various privileges and oppressions — without reducing the potential for everything to be linked in a network of ambiguities?” (p. 60). Leading off the second section of the book, which features articles related to social and political activism, Josué Q. Estrada provides an excellent overview of voter suppression in Yakima County, Washington, in the 1960s and 1970s, and the efforts of local officials to resist state directives and federal laws designed to protect voting rights. It is helpful to reference this article when reading Oscar Rosales Casta- ñeda’s piece that looks at activism in both the Yakima Valley and the Puget Sound regions. Norma L. Cárdenas’ article is an oral history– based profile of María Alanís Ruiz, an activist and instrumental figure in the establishment of a Chicano-Latino studies program at Portland State University. Her story challenges assumptions of equality within academia by highlighting how tenured faculty and administrators are far from immune to racism and sexism. Ernesto Todd Mireles details eight years of struggle and sacrifice to establish a Xicanx Studies program at Michigan State University in the 1990s. I wish he had given more space in his chapter to addressing the needs that Xicanx Studies address (more on how this alternate spelling reflects a commitment to honor 131 Reviews Indigenous needs and heritage). Nevertheless, this article provides a detailed look at certain types of conflicts within academia that rarely get recounted in peer-reviewed articles, with the author unafraid to name names. Mireles suggests on page 128 that I might not be his target audience, and this account should prove useful to those looking to create...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it